news

French publishing house: great catalogues that look east and south, not just west.

Darwin Grenwich sails the oceans of the world on Blue Monday, a CS36 traditional sloop, while maintaining his IT support business by email and on VOIP (403-283-1340). He is especially good on Macs. This is not an ad, just something you might want to know about.

 

who we are

May 23: Leigh Sherkin. Urban Ruralism: the culture of food production in urban areas.   On Site review 27: rural urbanism, spring 2012

Leigh Sherkin. Farm:Shop aquaponic systemUrban Ruralism: the culture of food production in urban areas.  Urban areas are expanding while labour migrates out of the countryside.  Farms are becoming suburbs and a handful of companies control the supply chain.  If we produce food in the city, can our relationship with food change?

 

Leigh Sherkin is the director of  the urban planning company, specialising in community planning and regeneration.  theurbanplanningcompany.com

 

current issue

on site 27: rural urbanism

On Site: another way to talk about architecture.

Almost guaranteed to contain things you will never find anywhere else.

back issues
acknowledgements

The Canada Council for the Arts Grants to Literary and Arts Magazines

Erin Stump ProjectsTorkin Manes, Barristers & Solicitors, Toronto

Saskatchewan Association of Architects

The University of Edinburgh

Calgary Arts Development Authority, City of Calgary, Alberta

On Site is a Magazines Canada member

Powered by Squarespace
« Chaubin 2 | Main | »
Tuesday
Feb152011

Frédéric Chaubin's USSR

The architecture faculty at Minsk polytechnic, with a succession of overhanging lecture theatres. Minsk, Belarus, 1983. Photographer: Frédéric ChaubinAbove: the architecture building at Minsk Polytechnic.  I would not be surprised had this been a photo taken on any Canadian campus.

Frédéric Chaubin documents 90 soviet-era buildings in a new book, Cosmic Communist Constructions Photographed (CCCP- get it?).  Some of the images are on the Guardian website, with the introduction:
'They reveal an unexpected rebirth of imagination, a burgeoning that took place from 1970 until 1990 and in which, contrary to the 20s and 30s, no school or main trend emerges.  These building represent a chaotic impulse brought about by a decaying system.  Their diversity announces the end of the Soviet Union.'

I find this commentary both spurious and confused.  1970 was a long way from 1989, must we continue to believe that Stalinism reigned implacable and as solid as concrete until the wall fell, and any sign of architectural exploration was necessarily aberrant and subversive?  The relationship of architecture to political systems is rarely thought of outside the use of buildings as deliberately partisan symbols which, as most architects in practice know, is the least of a building's form.

In that architecture is a cultural product and as such comprises an archive of cultural systems, yes, one can point to the transparency of the International Style of the 1950s and 1960s as part of the USA's optimistic demonstration of its 'openness' in comparison to Soviet 'closedness', but the architects of such projects were not building political manifestos, they were absorbed in the exploration of curtain wall technology. 
And since when is diversity seen as chaotic?  The language used when speaking of the Soviet Union is still so slanted it makes one wonder if the Cold War is actually over.  

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

One of the more interesting pieces of orphaned USSR architecture in North America is the USSR Pavilion of Expo 67 World Exposition in Montréal, Canada: http://expo67.ncf.ca/expo_ussr_p1.html

July 25, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Newcomb

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>